Brief Overview of Assessment Types

short-answer    true/false     multiple choice     matching    essay     context-dependent item sets
 

type example strengths weaknesses suggestions for developing
short-answer items
  • questions
  • completions
  • identifications
  • relatively easy to construct
  • fairly objective
  • low probability of guessing
  • not completely objective
  • assess only important aspects of the target
  • write in question form
  • make sure there is only one correct answer
  • paraphrase rather than copying directly
  • if using "fill-ins" make sure the missing word is important not trivial
  • make sure there are only 1 or 2 blanks
  • avoid grammatical clues as to the answer
true-false items
  • yes/no
  • true/false
  • right/wrong
  • correction
  • yes/no with explanation
  • relatively easy to write
  • scored easily and objectively
  • some subject matter lends itself to this type of assessment
  • can cover a wide range of topics in a short amount of time
  • poorly constructed ones often only assess trivial facts
  • can be ambiguously worded
  • can be answered by blind guessing
  • may cause students to study for trivial "right/wrong" information
  • assess more than recall
  • compare between concepts
  • use for causal or conditional propositions
  • choose between relationships or events
  • make predictions about phenomena or events
  • list steps in a procedure or process 
  •  (Ebel, 1972)
multiple choice items
  • correct answer
  • best answer
  • multiple responses
  • incomplete statements
  • negative (NOT) answers
  • "fill-in"
  • can be used with a greater variety of learning targets
  • do not require students to elaborate thereby reducing "bluffing"
  • focus the student on reading and thinking
  • less of a chance for guessing
  • incorrect answer chosen may give you insight into problem areas
  • do not require students to write out and elaborate their answers
  • students must choose from a fixed list rather than expressing themselves
  • poorly written questions may be superficial, trivial or limited to factual knowledge
  • focus items to assess specific learning targets
  • prepare the stem as a question or problem to be solved
  • write a correct, concise alternative
  • write distracters that are plausible
matching exercise
  • perfect matching (equal number of premises and responses)
  • unequal matching
  • space saving
  • compact
  • objective
  • good for identifying associations or relationships
  • students can use rote memorization
  • make sure the premises and responses all belong tot he same category of information
  • make sure every element in the response list functions as a plausible alternative to every element in the premise list
  • make sure there are more than 10 responses
  • avoid perfect matching
  • if possible, order the elements in the response list in a meaningful way
  • number the premises and letter the responses
essay items
  • restricted response items (limit both the content and the form of the answer)
  • extended response (students are free to express their own ideas and inter-relationships among their ideas and use their own organization structure
  • particularly appropriate for some learning targets
  • particularly appropriate for assessing multiple learning targets at once
  • scoring reliability may be low
  • scoring is time consuming
  • make sure the student is applying his/her knowledge and skill in a new or novel situation
  • make the item focussed on a particular topic
  • make sure the student is required to demonstrate more than recall of facts, ideas, lists
  • make sure the item is worded so that all students interpret the assignment in the way intended
context-dependent item sets introductory material followed by several assessment tasks
  • provides an opportunity to assess students on materials that are relatively close to the real-world or authentic contexts
  • provides, through the introductory material, the same context for everyone
  • providing introductory material lessens the burden of memorization
  • may be difficult to construct
  • introductory material needs to be carefully crafted in order to assess higher-order skills
  • may not generalize to other settings
  • may require students to use skills that were unintended for this assessment
  • make sure the introductory material is prominent so it is read first
  • keep the introductory material and the questions on the same page