M    A     R    T    I     N      C    O    M    M    U    N    I    T   Y      C    O    L    L    E    G   E


To Martin Community College Home Page







Online Teaching Resource Center


Instructional Strategies


 

 

 

Developing a Learning Community

Virtual Communities

Often people are stumped when it comes to online communication strategies that extend beyond email. The goal you should think about moving toward is a learning community. There are four elements that define a traditional community:

  1. shared space
  2. interaction among members
  3. shared interest
  4. a common goal

These four elements are easy to transfer to Virtual Communities – all of them are still applicable. But there is an added dimension when moving online. The traditions, customs, and mores that people are used to using in the real world don't always translate into the virtual world. Body language is missing, customs of how to act when entering the classroom are missing, the physical classroom no longer plays a part. Even when an online class starts and ends is often a source of confusion. And this lack of a point of reference occurs for faculty as well as students. Administrators need to recognize this and assist students and faculty in their adjustment to this new environment.

So why do we care about developing a learning community? First, research shows that people process information into knowledge better through interaction with others. This happens through verbalization of ideas, explanation of concepts, and answering questions that others have. How many of you have thought about the fact that you really learn material when you teach it or explain it to someone else? Well that is what this is about. And it works best when the interaction occurs between peers – not just between the instructor and the student.

Accrediting Agencies

This understanding of how learning occurs is also reinforced by the accreditation agencies. The Southern Association of Schools and Colleges issued guidelines for online degree and certificate programs in 2002, "Best practices for electronically offered degree and certificate programs". These best practices were developed by the accrediting commissions in response to the emergence of technologically mediated instruction, so they refer not only to programs offered completely at a distance but may, in fact, be used for any instruction that uses technology as the delivery mode. These guidelines are not new criteria, but reflections of the essential characteristics that the accrediting agencies have published in the past.

Of particular importance with regard to developing a community of learners are:

Section 2e "The importance of appropriate interaction (synchronous or asynchronous) between instructor and students and among students is reflected in the design of the program and its courses, and in the technical facilities and services provided"

Section 4d "The institution recognizes that a sense of community is important to the success of many students, and that an ongoing, long-term relationship is beneficial to both student and institution"

Section 1h "The institution provides students with reasonable technical support for each educational technology hardware, software, and delivery system required in a program"

Section 3b "The institution provides an ongoing program of appropriate technical, design, and production support for participating faculty members"


Here we will talk about some of the elements that can contribute to a learning community and how to develop a sense of community without an element of co-location. Included are items that have been used in online courses at various institutions. They are provided as examples and are not intended to be the "correct" method of doing things. Each faculty member has their own teaching style that is a reflection of who they are, who their students are, and what the content of the course is. That should be respected online as it is in the classroom.


Faculty

For faculty, participation in an online class can be excellent preparation for teaching online. It allows you to see a model of one way that it can be done; it gives a firsthand look at difficulties (technical, cognitive, and personally, such as time management) that students may encounter; it can provide an opportunity to experience an online community (perhaps for the first time), and it provides a glance at the technical requirements for computer mediated instruction. Participation in an online course can also give you a reference point for developing your own learning community online; either through a positive experience or a negative one. If you have the opportunity to participate in an online class, give it a try.


If you've never seen a cat or a picture of a cat,
how can you be expected to draw one?

 


Students

For students, it's important to supply cues to appropriate behavior for the online classroom as well as to develop exercises that build interaction.

You shouldn't assume that they have taken an online class before, or, if they have, that it was run the same way that you choose to run your course. Always supply information to students at the beginning of class. And then use techniques such as modeling appropriate behavior and storytelling to assist them in participating in this new experience.

Prior to class beginning, or at the very beginning of the class, you may want to send a letter to enrolled students that details:

  • where they should log on
  • whether your course follows a set schedule and what that schedule is
  • the types of activities they can expect to participate in -- for instance, whether there is a great deal of communication between students or online chat sessions that are scheduled
  • the URL if you have posted a schedule online
  • textbooks that they need to secure before the start of class
  • how they can attain an email address
  • contact information for technical support
  • contact information for the instructor

Many students are not aware of how an online course will proceed so you want to provide as much information as possible to let students begin the course with the same level of comfort that they would have walking into a physical classroom. If your class is a hybrid course where you will meet occasionally on campus but the majority of the class is over the Web, then you can supply this information at the first class meeting and offer a quick tutorial to those students who aren't familiar with Blackboard so that they can see how to log in.


Technical and pedagogical assumptions

SACS, in section 4b states that "Prior to admitting a student to the program, the institution:

  • Ascertains by a review of pertinent records and/or personal review that the student is qualified by prior education or equivalent experience to be admitted to that program, including in the case of international students, English language skills.
  • Informs the prospective student concerning required access to technologies used in the program.
  • Informs the prospective student concerning technical competence required of students in the program.
  • Informs the prospective student concerning estimated or average program costs (including costs of information access) and associated payment and refund policies.
  • Informs the prospective student concerning curriculum design and the time frame in which courses are offered, and assists the student in understanding the nature of the learning objectives.
  • Informs the prospective student of library and other learning services available to support learning and the skills necessary to access them.
  • Informs the prospective students concerning the full array of other support services available form the institution.
  • Informs the prospective student about arrangements for interaction with the faculty and fellow students."

Although SACS defines these at the program level, you can use the same guidelines at the course level. An example would be to provide students with technical and prior knowledge assumptions in the course syllabus.

EXAMPLE:
It is assumed that students enrolled in the course:

  • have access to a computer with Internet connectivity
  • have skills in using the Internet (use of a browser, web searching, creating web pages, file transfer, and electronic mail)
  • have completed any prerequisites
  • have experience in searching the academic literature for information to support course discussions

This presents, in black and white, elements that a student needs to successfully begin the course. If they don't have these skills, then they are asked to contact the instructor so that an individual evaluation can be done of whether or not this is the most appropriate course for them to be taking.


Course expectations

In the beginning of the semester it is important to inform students (whether face-to-face or online) what the expectations of them are, as well as what they can expect of the instructor. For example:

The following course contract is based on an article by Deborah A. Byrnes in the November 2001 issue of The Teaching Professor*.

EXAMPLE:
As a student in this course, you have a right to expect:
  • a complete syllabus with clearly stated assignments, due dates, course objectives, and a fair grading policy
  • complete contact information for the professor
  • a course that begins and ends within the time allotted for the semester
  • opportunities to discuss the course, and related topics, with the professor outside of class
  • the opportunity to have drafts of papers/assignments reviewed by the professor if submitted well in advance of the due date
  • the return of papers/assignments within two weeks provided they were turned in on time
  • reevaluation of any work that a student thinks may have been graded unfairly
  • assistance in locating supporting materials to complete papers/assignments


As the instructor for for this course, I have the right to expect that students will:

  • prepare for each instructional module by reading all required assignments
  • actively participate in online discussions serving as both student and teacher
  • ask for clarification or assistance when needed
  • share any concerns about the course in a timely manner
  • turn in assignments on time
  • inform me about any extenuating circumstances affecting course participation
  • observe codes of academic honesty in the completion of all course work
  • understand online learning moves quickly and requires self-discipline; students will actively participate in the discussion online for the same amount of time each week that he/she would normally spend in the classroom for a 3-hour course
  • spend an adequate amount of time preparing for course discussions; it is estimated for an upper-level undergraduate course such as this that prep time will be at least the same amount of time as in-class time. Therefore for this online course students should expect to spend 6 hours per week just on this course – 3 hours preparing and 3 hours in discussion.

*Byrnes, D.A. (2001). Course contract encourages student responsibility and civility. The Teaching Professor, (15, no. 9), Madison, WI: Magna Publications.

 

In particular, it is important to stress the last two items. The time students spend in an online class is different from the time they spend in a face-to-face class. If face-to-face is what they are used to then they realize they need to spend a certain amount of time reading the material, preparing for class, completing assignments, and then they spend a certain amount of time physically in the classroom – usually for 3 hours per week. But when they move to an online environment, that distinction between "individual" time and "class" time becomes blurred – it all becomes one big block of time. This may be why students report that they feel they spend more time in on online class than they do face-to-face. It may not be that more time is spent but that the distribution of hours simply differs.

Does this mean that all students will adhere to all of these guidelines? No. But at least they are informed upfront what the course will be like.


Discussion forums

One of the benefits of an online class is that students may log into the course at different times and days and carry on a conversation about the subject content. But online conversation doesn't occur without the instructor providing structure to the students and requiring them to participate. It is up to the instructor to post an open-ended question, usually concerning the readings for a particular section, as well as a timeline for students to respond. It is also important to supply instructions on how to use the Discussion Board for students who may be new to online learning. This section specifically addresses how to use the Discussion Board in Blackboard to conduct asynchronous conversations online. Topics covered will be:

  • Guidelines for acceptable behavior – netiquette
  • Guidelines for participation
  • Modeling appropriate behavior
  • Hints for developing the discussion community
  • Hints for developing open ended questions


Some students are not sure how to behave in an online environment. Other students are used to being online chatting with friends or playing interactive games. In either case, students will benefit from hearing what you expect for appropriate behavior in your class. Etiquette for the online world is often call Netiquette.

Guidelines for acceptable behavior in discussion forums should be provided at the beginning of the semester. While you will want to customize the list to fit your particular class, some items you may want to include are:

  • students should "listen" to others respectfully
  • online learning is devoid of physical cues that often support communication; students should strive to utilize language that is thoughtful, respectful, and collegial when communicating with fellow students
  • sometimes students may disagree with one another, which is perfectly acceptable; strive to critique ideas in a respectful and constructive manner, not criticize an individual
  • direct comments to fellow students, rather than to the professor
  • try to understand other people's behavior and perspectives rather than simply criticizing them
  • avoid stereotypes and humor that are disparaging of others
  • intervene politely if someone is being disrespectful or unfair to others
  • use language, spelling and grammar that is appropriate to an educational setting; do not use slang or Internet shorthand, and remember to proofread work prior to posting it for the class to read.

It is also important to provide a guide which gives students the grading criteria for class participation. Decide at the beginning of the semester how important the online discussion will be and assign an appropriate percentage of the final grade to participation. Keep in mind that if something isn't required (and rewarded through grade points) few students will participate. Many instructors require everyone to participate in the discussion and make it a substantial portion of the students' grade – they can't pass the course if they don't participate.

EXAMPLE:

Class Participation Grading
(class participation for this class was worth 25 points out of a total of 100 points for the semester)

Level 1 - 20-25 points

  • provides concrete examples from the readings to support postings
  • integrates prior readings in postings
  • integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate and highly insightful way
  • presents new observations
  • constructively responds to classmates postings
  • participates in all module discussions
  • organization of post is very clear and presented in a logical sequence
  • word choice and sentence structure are suitable for undergraduate level work

Level 2 - 14-19 points:

  • provides some examples from the readings to support postings
  • integrates some personal observations and knowledge
  • presents new observations
  • constructively responds to classmates postings
  • participates in all module discussions
  • organization of post is clear and presented in a logical sequence
  • word choice and sentence structure are suitable for undergraduate level work

Level 3 - 7-13 points:

  • alludes to the readings to support postings
  • integrates personal observations and knowledge in a cursory manner
  • does not present new observations
  • constructively responds to classmates postings
  • participates in 6 of 8 module discussions
  • organization of post is unclear and not presented in a logical sequence
  • word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for undergraduate level work

Level 4 - 0-6 points:

  • alludes to the readings to support postings
  • does not integrate personal observations or knowledge
  • does not present new observations
  • responds in a cursory manner to classmates postings
  • participates in less than 6 module discussions
  • organization of posts are unclear and not presented in a logical sequence
  • word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for undergraduate level work

All of this, provided in the beginning and referred back to during the semester, helps students to feel "grounded" – to feel like they aren't entering alien space and that they actually know what is expected of them in this new environment. Some of them may not like it – but at least they know.

For assessing participation, you may want to use a spread sheet for grades. At the end of a module go into the appropriate discussion forum in Blackboard and sort the discussion thread by author (this is a feature of Blackboard located down at the bottom of the web page for the forum). This provides an easy way to look through the postings. Review them and assign a level to the module twice – once for initial posting and once for responses. So Ann might have a Level 1 for posting but didn't respond to any posts so she gets a level 4. Too many non-responses and all of those level ones disappear because it states in the rubric that they have to participate in at least 6 of the modules and participation works 2 ways – initial posts and responses.

At the beginning of the semester, if a student isn't working at a high level send an email to that student explaining what is missing and give examples. This way they know immediately what they need to work on and how to improve. If you notice improvement, then follow-up with an additional email congratulating them and urging them to continue in their new ways. This gives affirmation that they are doing well and increases motivation to continue to do so.

At midterm, send a class participation grade so that they can see if they need any improvement. Or post their participation grades to the Blackboard gradebook.

Again – they need to know if they are doing well and if they aren't – otherwise how can they improve?


Cybercafe

A Cybercafe (sometimes called "coffee break", "break room", "student lounge") is a discussion forum space reserved for chatting and non-class related socializing. It is mirroring what students do in the classroom when they arrive a little early and chat with the students sitting near them. The literature suggests that when members of a learning community begin to know each other on a level outside of the classroom they feel greater responsibility to the other members of the community, they identify with the other members of the group, they feel their opinions are important, and they are more likely to participate in discussions.

For more information see: Hanna, D.E., Glowacki-Dudka, M. and Conceicai-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of web-based education.Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing: Tips 110, 115, 117.


Model Appropriate Behavior

It is important in an online class to model the behavior you want to see; again, students aren't familiar with this environment and look to the instructor for cues on how to behave.

At the beginning of a course, have students introduce themselves in a discussion forum. Your own introduction would naturally be posted first to set an example of what you would like to see in the students' posts. Perhaps go beyond simply listing your academic credentials and provide humorous or personal information; students will follow your lead in what to post

When you response to student introductions, try to make a connection to each; again, this leads to other students doing the same. For example, if someone says they grew up in St. Louis, you could respond that you have been there and really enjoyed the botanical gardens.

You may also want to post a reminder to students after most initial introductions have been posted that they should also be responding to each other. An analogy of being at a party can help to reinforce how important responses are -- how would they feel if they walked up to a person and introduced themselves and the other person just stood there and looked at them?

 

Analogies back to the physical world provide students
with an indication of what appropriate behavior is.

 

How you, as the instructor, act in the online environment may be the first model students have seen of appropriate online behavior.


Developing a discussion community

These tips were gathered from a review of the literature as well as from instructors teaching online.

  • Make sure in the beginning that students aren't addressing their posts just to you
  • Prompt those who aren't participating through email
  • General rule – if you would say "it" out loud in the classroom then it goes in the discussion forum. If you would say "it" privately to a student then use email.
  • Questions that come to you in the form of email should generally be redirected to the forum for clarification for everyone.
  • Start slow with a general conversation.
  • But get into student-led tasks early so that they become used to it.
  • Use open-ended questions
  • The hardest part – not responding to every post. Allow students to respond back to each other and develop a conversation among themselves. Naturally you need to step in immediately to correct any misconceptions but keep in mind that as soon as the Professor speaks all other conversations stop because the Expert has given his/her opinion. If you are uncomfortable keeping silent on the side, post something like, "I have reviewed and constructed comments on the assignments that have been posted for module two but I'm withholding them for now. I've found that posting my opinion (as the "expert") decreases the response rate of others. I (and others in the class) want to hear what you think about the items posted -- do you agree with your colleagues interpretation of the readings and how it is presented? "
  • Open-ended questions are the key to jump-starting a discussion.


Community Building

Don't be afraid of utilizing strategies that build community by encouraging interaction between members:

  • small group assignments
  • peer review
  • guest speakers
  • partnerships for projects

But remember that you will need to provide your students with the means and directions to accomplish these methods. Even if you aren't using these strategies in the classroom give them a try online. What many instructors are finding is that they try something new online and end up adopting it for their face-to-face classes.


Small Group Assignments

Help them with how to get started:

  • You may want to assign a group leader – some students have mentioned that this would be helpful in getting things rolling quicker. It can be as easy as the first name alphabetically is the leader.
  • Set up a separate discussion forum for each group to have a space to conduct their work. Tell them you'll be "dropping by" their forum occasionally to monitor progress. Use a classroom analogy of wandering around the classroom as they work in their groups and have you listening over their shoulders. Just remember, if you told them you will monitor the discussion forums, do so.
  • Use the Groups feature in Blackboard
  • Offer the chat space in Blackboard for them to use. Provide information on how they can use this technology. A hint here is to schedule the time for them – otherwise you will happen to get two groups in the space at the same time. You may want to review the log chats to see how they are doing; however,
  • Give them autonomy just as you would a classroom based small group.
  • Small groups are great for case studies where students are presented with a problem and asked to work out a solution.


Guest Speakers

Guest speakers are an asset in classrooms and they can also be used online. It may actually be easier to schedule them for online classes since they don't have to be located near your campus and they have more flexibility with their time commitment. To do this, you set up a discussion forum and establish guidelines for student and guest participation.

EXAMPLE:

In an instructional design class, one instructional designer from the military and one instructional designer from a corporate setting were invited to talk to the students about their daily work. The students had assigned readings from the textbook that talked about these environments and then had the opportunity to interact with people in the field when they might not know anyone in that field. Students were required to post initial questions to the experts by Monday at 8 am. The experts had agreed to log in sometime Monday or Tuesday and answer student questions. Students then had an opportunity to respond and/or ask follow-up questions and the experts had agreed to read and respond to posts on Thursday or Friday. This arrangement allowed a specific time commitment on the part of the experts and let them know what they were getting into – after all, it was a new environment for them as well!

You can also have guest speakers in a chat session although you really need to limit the number of students involved since too many people (generally more than 5) in a chat session gets very complicated.


Chat Sessions

With discussion forums we are talking about asynchronous communication – students don't need to be logged on at a particular time. But synchronous communication can also be used in online communities. Blackboard includes an online chat feature for students and instructors to use. You can include PowerPoint slides and draw pictures as well as type in text conversations. Chat sessions are particularly good for individual assessments; if you feel that a student may not be grasping a concept you can arrange a day and time for a chat session. Meet in the chat space and question that individual in "real time" with follow-up questions and asking for clarification of points. Of course, you can also use this technique by setting up a telephone appointment with them! Not everything has to be online.

Again, you want to provide instructions for using the tool, and model the behavior you want to see. Expectations for typographical errors and grammar are generally more relaxed in a chat than they would be in a discussion forum – it is a more informal form of communication. You also need to remember the differences in speed – both typing speed and Internet connection speed. This can result in postings that get out of order – it helps to answer direct questions using the person's name. Chats can also be used for online office hours.

Conclusion

As you can see, there are many ways to facilitate an online learning community. The trick is getting out and experimenting with what is available and deciding what will work best in your class with your particular students and your content area. For further information, check out the following resources:


Bender, T. (2003). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Conrad, R.M and Donaldson, J.A. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Fink: L.D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hanna, DE, Glowacki-Dudka, M. and Conceicai-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of web-based education. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing

Salmon, G. (2003). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. Snyder, W.M. (20020: Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

 

Assessment Online

The following resources were used in the development of this web page:

Nitko, A.J. (1996). Educational assessment of students. 2nd ed. Englewood, NJ: Merrill.

Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning. Educational Technology, September, 28-33.


Assessment of individuals can be used to provide feedback to students about their learning, to diagnose problem areas, to provide feedback to the instructor, to define for students what is most important, to motivate students, and to grade students as to their quality of their assignments. They can also be used by institutions to make various decisions about a student such as selection for inclusion in a program or school, placement in various levels of instruction, classification (similar to selection but the categories are independent rather than ranked in a single category) or the awarding of a credential in a particular area.

To select and use assessment results meaningfully you need to be clear about the learning targets you want to assess and be sure that the assessment techniques you select match the learning targets. The specific tasks or procedures you use in an assessment should always permit the student to display the skill or knowledge stated in the learning target. The also need to be valid and reliable.

Nitko (p. 103) suggests three criteria for selecting an assessment procedure:

  1. the learning targets to be achieved
  2. the purpose of the assessment (see definitions below for formative or summative evaluations)
  3. the advantages of a particular technique to support numbers 1 & 2

He also suggests (p. 124) three fundamental principles for crafting assessment:

  1. focus only on important learning targets
  2. elicit from students only the knowledge and performance that are relevant to the learning target
  3. neither prevent nor inhibit a student's ability to demonstrate attainment of the learning target

Each assessment type has its own advantages and disadvantages. This chart supplies an overview of assessment types.


Important terminology:

  • assessment: a process for obtaining information that is used for making decisions about students, curricula and programs and educational policy
  • test: more narrow than assessment; an instrument or systematic procedure for observing and describing one or more characteristics of a student using either a numerical scale or a classification scheme
  • measurement: a procedure for assigning numbers (usually called scores) to a specified attribute or characteristic of a person in such a way that the numbers describe the degree to which the person possesses the attribute
  • evaluation: the process of making a value judgment about the worth of a student's product or performance; may or may not be based on measurements or test results
  • formative evaluation: judgment about quality or worth made during the process of designing or developing instructional materials, instructional procedures, curricula or educational programs; the purpose is to modify or improve the product before it is widely used
  • summative evaluation: judgment about the quality or worth of already completed instructional materials, instructional procedures, curricula or educational programs; goal is to summarize strengths or weaknesses and describe the extent to which a properly implemented program or procedure has attained its stated goals and objectives
  • norm-referenced interpretations: describes assessed performance in terms of a person's position in a reference group
  • criterion-referenced interpretations: assessed performance in terms of the kinds of tasks a person with a given score can do
  • objectivity: the degree to which every observer of a student's performance will give exactly the same report or result (Cronbach, 1990)
  • standardization: the degree to which the observational procedures, administrative procedures, equipment and materials, and scoring rules have been fixed so that, insofar as possible, the same procedure can occur at different times and places (Cronbach, 1990)
  • power assessments: the main focus is to assess the amount of knowledge, comprehension or understanding a student possesses so no time limit is placed or the time limit is very generous
  • rubric: a coherent set of rules used to assess the quality of a student's performance; guides the raters judgments and ensures scoring is more objective

Nitko's emphasis on objective reality contrasts with the subjective reality which is the basis for constructivist learning. Constructivists believe that learners can only interpret information in the context of their own experiences and that what they interpret will, to a certain extent, be individualistic so evaluation guidelines such as those established by Nitko are less useful.

Jonassen (1991) suggests the following criteria for evaluating constructivist learning:

  • goal-free evaluations: an evaluation is more effective if the evaluator is not informed in advance what the goals of the instruction are; rather than relating evaluation in terms of goals Scriven (1973) recommends using needs assessment methods to determine what the goals of education should be since verified needs provide the most objective standards
    based on authentic tasks
  • need to focus on learning outcomes and evaluations that reflect the intellectual process of knowledge construction; do this by focusing on the higher levels of learning outcomes
  • evaluate the process of knowledge acquisition, not the product
    evaluation should be context dependent and should reflect the complexities of the learning
  • multiple perspectives: if it is appropriate to present multiple perspectives in learning environments with the expectation that learners will meaningfully accommodate these different perspectives, then it is equally important to reflect and accept those multiple perspectives in the evaluation process; may be accomplished through a panel of reviewers
  • use portfolios rather than a single product, particularly those that reflect different stages of the learning process
  • allow the learners to negotiate the goals of learning and evaluation

"Evaluation from a constructivist perspective should be less of a reinforcement and/or behavior control tool and more of a self-analysis and meta-cognitive tool" p. 32

 

Assessment in Blackboard

Blackboard provides several ways to assess student progress during a course.

Surveys record answers anonymously. This option is used for informal assessments of an entire class, opinion polls, or course evaluations. Survey results are non-graded and anonymous so they aren't suitable for summative evaluation.

Quizzes and tests are available for assessing individual student knowledge. They can be set up for automatic grading, immediate feedback of answers, and/or submission for grading by the instructor.

Types of questions supported by Blackboard:

  • Multiple Choice
  • True False
  • Fill in the Blank
  • Multiple Answer
  • Ordering
  • Matching
  • Short Answer/Essay

Creating a survey or test is very easy. As the instructor for your course:

  • Click on the Control Panel button
  • Click on Assessment Manager
  • Click on Add Survey
  • Name the survey
  • Type in a brief description of the survey
  • Click on the Submit button
  • Type in the instructions for completing the survey
  • Click on the Submit button
  • Select the type of question and you're off!

You can type in all of your questions and reorder them after they are all in. You can also go back and edit the questions. If you are creating a test, you'll have the opportunity to provide the correct answer to a question. Surveys do not have correct answers associated with them.


Assessment Pools

Also called a question pool, this feature allows instructors to give exams and quizzes from a bank of questions. So questions are posted to students randomly. To use this feature you'll need to develop a bank of questions to pull from. Instead of clicking on Add Survey as described above you'll click on Pool Manager and then follow the instructions.

 

 

 

 

Developed by Susan M. Colaric for Martin Community College. May 2004. All rights reserved.