|
Instructional
Strategies
Developing a Learning Community
Virtual Communities
Often people are stumped when it comes to online communication
strategies that extend beyond email. The goal you should think about
moving toward is a learning community. There are four elements
that define a traditional community:
- shared space
- interaction among members
- shared interest
- a common goal
These four elements are easy to transfer to Virtual Communities
all of them are still applicable. But there is an added dimension
when moving online. The traditions, customs, and mores that people
are used to using in the real world don't always translate into
the virtual world. Body language is missing, customs of how to act
when entering the classroom are missing, the physical classroom
no longer plays a part. Even when an online class starts and ends
is often a source of confusion. And this lack of a point of reference
occurs for faculty as well as students. Administrators need to recognize
this and assist students and faculty in their adjustment to this
new environment.
So why do we care about developing a learning community? First,
research shows that people process information into knowledge better
through interaction with others. This happens through verbalization
of ideas, explanation of concepts, and answering questions that
others have. How many of you have thought about the fact that you
really learn material when you teach it or explain it to someone
else? Well that is what this is about. And it works best when the
interaction occurs between peers not just between the instructor
and the student.
Accrediting Agencies
This understanding of how learning occurs is also reinforced by
the accreditation agencies. The Southern Association of Schools
and Colleges issued guidelines for online degree and certificate
programs in 2002, "Best
practices for electronically offered degree and certificate programs".
These best practices were developed by the accrediting commissions
in response to the emergence of technologically mediated instruction,
so they refer not only to programs offered completely at a distance
but may, in fact, be used for any instruction that uses technology
as the delivery mode. These guidelines are not new criteria, but
reflections of the essential characteristics that the accrediting
agencies have published in the past.
Of particular importance with regard to developing a community
of learners are:
Section 2e "The importance of appropriate interaction (synchronous
or asynchronous) between instructor and students and among students
is reflected in the design of the program and its courses, and in
the technical facilities and services provided"
Section 4d "The institution recognizes that a sense of community
is important to the success of many students, and that an ongoing,
long-term relationship is beneficial to both student and institution"
Section 1h "The institution provides students with reasonable
technical support for each educational technology hardware, software,
and delivery system required in a program"
Section 3b "The institution provides an ongoing program of
appropriate technical, design, and production support for participating
faculty members"
Here we will talk about some of the elements that can contribute
to a learning community and how to develop a sense of community
without an element of co-location. Included are items that have
been used in online courses at various institutions. They are provided
as examples and are not intended to be the "correct" method
of doing things. Each faculty member has their own teaching style
that is a reflection of who they are, who their students are, and
what the content of the course is. That should be respected online
as it is in the classroom.
Faculty
For faculty, participation in an online class can be excellent
preparation for teaching online. It allows you to see a model of
one way that it can be done; it gives a firsthand look at difficulties
(technical, cognitive, and personally, such as time management)
that students may encounter; it can provide an opportunity to experience
an online community (perhaps for the first time), and it provides
a glance at the technical requirements for computer mediated instruction.
Participation in an online course can also give you a reference
point for developing your own learning community online; either
through a positive experience or a negative one. If you have the
opportunity to participate in an online class, give it a try.
|
If you've never seen a cat or a picture
of a cat,
how can you be expected to draw one?
|
Students
For students, it's important to supply cues to appropriate behavior
for the online classroom as well as to develop exercises that build
interaction.
You shouldn't assume that they have taken an online class before,
or, if they have, that it was run the same way that you choose to
run your course. Always supply information to students at the beginning
of class. And then use techniques such as modeling appropriate behavior
and storytelling to assist them in participating in this new experience.
Prior to class beginning, or at the very beginning of the class,
you may want to send a letter to enrolled students that details:
- where they should log on
- whether your course follows a set schedule and what that schedule
is
- the types of activities they can expect to participate in --
for instance, whether there is a great deal of communication between
students or online chat sessions that are scheduled
- the URL if you have posted a schedule online
- textbooks that they need to secure before the start of class
- how they can attain an email address
- contact information for technical support
- contact information for the instructor
Many students are not aware of how an online course will proceed
so you want to provide as much information as possible to let students
begin the course with the same level of comfort that they would
have walking into a physical classroom. If your class is a hybrid
course where you will meet occasionally on campus but the majority
of the class is over the Web, then you can supply this information
at the first class meeting and offer a quick tutorial to those students
who aren't familiar with Blackboard so that they can see how to
log in.
Technical and pedagogical assumptions
SACS, in section 4b states that "Prior to admitting a student
to the program, the institution:
- Ascertains by a review of pertinent records and/or personal
review that the student is qualified by prior education or equivalent
experience to be admitted to that program, including in the case
of international students, English language skills.
- Informs the prospective student concerning required access to
technologies used in the program.
- Informs the prospective student concerning technical competence
required of students in the program.
- Informs the prospective student concerning estimated or average
program costs (including costs of information access) and associated
payment and refund policies.
- Informs the prospective student concerning curriculum design
and the time frame in which courses are offered, and assists the
student in understanding the nature of the learning objectives.
- Informs the prospective student of library and other learning
services available to support learning and the skills necessary
to access them.
- Informs the prospective students concerning the full array of
other support services available form the institution.
- Informs the prospective student about arrangements for interaction
with the faculty and fellow students."
Although SACS defines these at the program level, you can use the
same guidelines at the course level. An example would be to provide
students with technical and prior knowledge assumptions in the course
syllabus.
EXAMPLE:
It is assumed that students enrolled in the course:
- have access to a computer with Internet connectivity
- have skills in using the Internet (use of a browser, web searching,
creating web pages, file transfer, and electronic mail)
- have completed any prerequisites
- have experience in searching the academic literature for information
to support course discussions
This presents, in black and white, elements that a student needs
to successfully begin the course. If they don't have these skills,
then they are asked to contact the instructor so that an individual
evaluation can be done of whether or not this is the most appropriate
course for them to be taking.
Course expectations
In the beginning of the semester it is important to inform students
(whether face-to-face or online) what the expectations of them are,
as well as what they can expect of the instructor. For example:
The following course contract is based on an article by Deborah
A. Byrnes in the November 2001 issue of The Teaching Professor*.
EXAMPLE:
As a student in this course, you have a right to expect:
- a complete syllabus with clearly stated assignments, due dates,
course objectives, and a fair grading policy
- complete contact information for the professor
- a course that begins and ends within the time allotted for the
semester
- opportunities to discuss the course, and related topics, with
the professor outside of class
- the opportunity to have drafts of papers/assignments reviewed
by the professor if submitted well in advance of the due date
- the return of papers/assignments within two weeks provided they
were turned in on time
- reevaluation of any work that a student thinks may have been
graded unfairly
- assistance in locating supporting materials to complete papers/assignments
As the instructor for for this course, I have the right to expect
that students will:
- prepare for each instructional module by reading all required
assignments
- actively participate in online discussions serving as both student
and teacher
- ask for clarification or assistance when needed
- share any concerns about the course in a timely manner
- turn in assignments on time
- inform me about any extenuating circumstances affecting course
participation
- observe codes of academic honesty in the completion of all course
work
- understand online learning moves quickly and requires self-discipline;
students will actively participate in the discussion online for
the same amount of time each week that he/she would normally spend
in the classroom for a 3-hour course
- spend an adequate amount of time preparing for course discussions;
it is estimated for an upper-level undergraduate course such as
this that prep time will be at least the same amount of time as
in-class time. Therefore for this online course students should
expect to spend 6 hours per week just on this course 3
hours preparing and 3 hours in discussion.
*Byrnes, D.A. (2001). Course contract encourages student responsibility
and civility. The Teaching Professor, (15, no. 9), Madison, WI:
Magna Publications.
In particular, it is important to stress the last two items. The
time students spend in an online class is different from
the time they spend in a face-to-face class. If face-to-face is
what they are used to then they realize they need to spend a certain
amount of time reading the material, preparing for class, completing
assignments, and then they spend a certain amount of time physically
in the classroom usually for 3 hours per week. But when they
move to an online environment, that distinction between "individual"
time and "class" time becomes blurred it all becomes
one big block of time. This may be why students report that they
feel they spend more time in on online class than they do face-to-face.
It may not be that more time is spent but that the distribution
of hours simply differs.
Does this mean that all students will adhere to all of these guidelines?
No. But at least they are informed upfront what the course will
be like.
Discussion forums
One of the benefits of an online class is that students may log
into the course at different times and days and carry on a conversation
about the subject content. But online conversation doesn't occur
without the instructor providing structure to the students and requiring
them to participate. It is up to the instructor to post an open-ended
question, usually concerning the readings for a particular section,
as well as a timeline for students to respond. It is also important
to supply instructions on how to use the Discussion Board for students
who may be new to online learning. This section specifically addresses
how to use the Discussion Board in Blackboard to conduct asynchronous
conversations online. Topics covered will be:
- Guidelines for acceptable behavior netiquette
- Guidelines for participation
- Modeling appropriate behavior
- Hints for developing the discussion community
- Hints for developing open ended questions
Some students are not sure how to behave in an online environment.
Other students are used to being online chatting with friends or
playing interactive games. In either case, students will benefit
from hearing what you expect for appropriate behavior in your class.
Etiquette for the online world is often call Netiquette.
Guidelines for acceptable behavior in discussion forums should
be provided at the beginning of the semester. While you will want
to customize the list to fit your particular class, some items you
may want to include are:
- students should "listen" to others respectfully
- online learning is devoid of physical cues that often support
communication; students should strive to utilize language that
is thoughtful, respectful, and collegial when communicating with
fellow students
- sometimes students may disagree with one another, which is perfectly
acceptable; strive to critique ideas in a respectful and constructive
manner, not criticize an individual
- direct comments to fellow students, rather than to the professor
- try to understand other people's behavior and perspectives rather
than simply criticizing them
- avoid stereotypes and humor that are disparaging of others
- intervene politely if someone is being disrespectful or unfair
to others
- use language, spelling and grammar that is appropriate to an
educational setting; do not use slang or Internet shorthand, and
remember to proofread work prior to posting it for the class to
read.
It is also important to provide a guide which gives students the
grading criteria for class participation. Decide at the beginning
of the semester how important the online discussion will be and
assign an appropriate percentage of the final grade to participation.
Keep in mind that if something isn't required (and rewarded through
grade points) few students will participate. Many instructors require
everyone to participate in the discussion and make it a substantial
portion of the students' grade they can't pass the course
if they don't participate.
EXAMPLE:
Class Participation Grading
(class participation for this class was worth 25 points out of a
total of 100 points for the semester)
Level 1 - 20-25 points
- provides concrete examples from the readings to support postings
- integrates prior readings in postings
- integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate
and highly insightful way
- presents new observations
- constructively responds to classmates postings
- participates in all module discussions
- organization of post is very clear and presented in a logical
sequence
- word choice and sentence structure are suitable for undergraduate
level work
Level 2 - 14-19 points:
- provides some examples from the readings to support postings
- integrates some personal observations and knowledge
- presents new observations
- constructively responds to classmates postings
- participates in all module discussions
- organization of post is clear and presented in a logical sequence
- word choice and sentence structure are suitable for undergraduate
level work
Level 3 - 7-13 points:
- alludes to the readings to support postings
- integrates personal observations and knowledge in a cursory
manner
- does not present new observations
- constructively responds to classmates postings
- participates in 6 of 8 module discussions
- organization of post is unclear and not presented in a logical
sequence
- word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for undergraduate
level work
Level 4 - 0-6 points:
- alludes to the readings to support postings
- does not integrate personal observations or knowledge
- does not present new observations
- responds in a cursory manner to classmates postings
- participates in less than 6 module discussions
- organization of posts are unclear and not presented in a logical
sequence
- word choice and sentence structure are not suitable for undergraduate
level work
All of this, provided in the beginning and referred back to during
the semester, helps students to feel "grounded"
to feel like they aren't entering alien space and that they actually
know what is expected of them in this new environment. Some of them
may not like it but at least they know.
For assessing participation, you may want to use a spread sheet
for grades. At the end of a module go into the appropriate discussion
forum in Blackboard and sort the discussion thread by author (this
is a feature of Blackboard located down at the bottom of the web
page for the forum). This provides an easy way to look through the
postings. Review them and assign a level to the module twice
once for initial posting and once for responses. So Ann might have
a Level 1 for posting but didn't respond to any posts so she gets
a level 4. Too many non-responses and all of those level ones disappear
because it states in the rubric that they have to participate in
at least 6 of the modules and participation works 2 ways
initial posts and responses.
At the beginning of the semester, if a student isn't working at
a high level send an email to that student explaining what is missing
and give examples. This way they know immediately what they need
to work on and how to improve. If you notice improvement, then follow-up
with an additional email congratulating them and urging them to
continue in their new ways. This gives affirmation that they are
doing well and increases motivation to continue to do so.
At midterm, send a class participation grade so that they can see
if they need any improvement. Or post their participation grades
to the Blackboard gradebook.
Again they need to know if they are doing well and if they
aren't otherwise how can they improve?
Cybercafe
A Cybercafe (sometimes called "coffee break", "break
room", "student lounge") is a discussion forum space
reserved for chatting and non-class related socializing. It is mirroring
what students do in the classroom when they arrive a little early
and chat with the students sitting near them. The literature suggests
that when members of a learning community begin to know each other
on a level outside of the classroom they feel greater responsibility
to the other members of the community, they identify with the other
members of the group, they feel their opinions are important, and
they are more likely to participate in discussions.
For more information see: Hanna, D.E., Glowacki-Dudka, M. and Conceicai-Runlee,
S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials
of web-based education.Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing: Tips
110, 115, 117.
Model Appropriate Behavior
It is important in an online class to model the behavior you want
to see; again, students aren't familiar with this environment and
look to the instructor for cues on how to behave.
At the beginning of a course, have students introduce themselves
in a discussion forum. Your own introduction would naturally be
posted first to set an example of what you would like to see in
the students' posts. Perhaps go beyond simply listing your academic
credentials and provide humorous or personal information; students
will follow your lead in what to post
When you response to student introductions, try to make a connection
to each; again, this leads to other students doing the same. For
example, if someone says they grew up in St. Louis, you could respond
that you have been there and really enjoyed the botanical gardens.
You may also want to post a reminder to students after most initial
introductions have been posted that they should also be responding
to each other. An analogy of being at a party can help to reinforce
how important responses are -- how would they feel if they walked
up to a person and introduced themselves and the other person just
stood there and looked at them?
|
Analogies back to the physical world provide
students
with an indication of what appropriate behavior is.
|
How you, as the instructor, act in the online environment may be
the first model students have seen of appropriate online behavior.
Developing a discussion community
These tips were gathered from a review of the literature as well
as from instructors teaching online.
- Make sure in the beginning that students aren't addressing
their posts just to you
- Prompt those who aren't participating through email
- General rule if you would say "it" out loud
in the classroom then it goes in the discussion forum. If you
would say "it" privately to a student then use email.
- Questions that come to you in the form of email should generally
be redirected to the forum for clarification for everyone.
- Start slow with a general conversation.
- But get into student-led tasks early so that they become used
to it.
- Use open-ended questions
- The hardest part not responding
to every post. Allow students to respond back to each other and
develop a conversation among themselves. Naturally you need to
step in immediately to correct any misconceptions but keep in
mind that as soon as the Professor speaks all other conversations
stop because the Expert has given his/her opinion. If you are
uncomfortable keeping silent on the side, post something like,
"I have reviewed and constructed comments on the assignments
that have been posted for module two but I'm withholding them
for now. I've found that posting my opinion (as the "expert")
decreases the response rate of others. I (and others in the class)
want to hear what you think about the items posted -- do you agree
with your colleagues interpretation of the readings and how it
is presented? "
- Open-ended questions are the key to jump-starting a discussion.
Community Building
Don't be afraid of utilizing strategies that build community by
encouraging interaction between members:
- small group assignments
- peer review
- guest speakers
- partnerships for projects
But remember that you will need to provide your students with the
means and directions to accomplish these methods. Even if you aren't
using these strategies in the classroom give them a try online.
What many instructors are finding is that they try something new
online and end up adopting it for their face-to-face classes.
Small Group Assignments
Help them with how to get started:
- You may want to assign a group leader some students
have mentioned that this would be helpful in getting things rolling
quicker. It can be as easy as the first name alphabetically is
the leader.
- Set up a separate discussion forum for each group to have a
space to conduct their work. Tell them you'll be "dropping
by" their forum occasionally to monitor progress. Use a classroom
analogy of wandering around the classroom as they work in their
groups and have you listening over their shoulders. Just remember,
if you told them you will monitor the discussion forums, do so.
- Use the Groups feature in Blackboard
- Offer the chat space in Blackboard for them to use. Provide
information on how they can use this technology. A hint here is
to schedule the time for them otherwise you will happen
to get two groups in the space at the same time. You may want
to review the log chats to see how they are doing; however,
- Give them autonomy just as you would a classroom based small
group.
- Small groups are great for case studies where students are presented
with a problem and asked to work out a solution.
Guest Speakers
Guest speakers are an asset in classrooms and they can also be
used online. It may actually be easier to schedule them for online
classes since they don't have to be located near your campus and
they have more flexibility with their time commitment. To do this,
you set up a discussion forum and establish guidelines for student
and guest participation.
EXAMPLE:
In an instructional design class, one instructional designer from
the military and one instructional designer from a corporate setting
were invited to talk to the students about their daily work. The
students had assigned readings from the textbook that talked about
these environments and then had the opportunity to interact with
people in the field when they might not know anyone in that field.
Students were required to post initial questions to the experts
by Monday at 8 am. The experts had agreed to log in sometime Monday
or Tuesday and answer student questions. Students then had an opportunity
to respond and/or ask follow-up questions and the experts had agreed
to read and respond to posts on Thursday or Friday. This arrangement
allowed a specific time commitment on the part of the experts and
let them know what they were getting into after all, it was
a new environment for them as well!
You can also have guest speakers in a chat session although you
really need to limit the number of students involved since too many
people (generally more than 5) in a chat session gets very complicated.
Chat Sessions
With discussion forums we are talking about asynchronous communication
students don't need to be logged on at a particular time.
But synchronous communication can also be used in online communities.
Blackboard includes an online chat feature for students and instructors
to use. You can include PowerPoint slides and draw pictures as well
as type in text conversations. Chat sessions are particularly good
for individual assessments; if you feel that a student may not be
grasping a concept you can arrange a day and time for a chat session.
Meet in the chat space and question that individual in "real
time" with follow-up questions and asking for clarification
of points. Of course, you can also use this technique by setting
up a telephone appointment with them! Not everything has to be online.
Again, you want to provide instructions for using the tool, and
model the behavior you want to see. Expectations for typographical
errors and grammar are generally more relaxed in a chat than they
would be in a discussion forum it is a more informal form
of communication. You also need to remember the differences in speed
both typing speed and Internet connection speed. This can
result in postings that get out of order it helps to answer
direct questions using the person's name. Chats can also be used
for online office hours.
Conclusion
As you can see, there are many ways to facilitate an online learning
community. The trick is getting out and experimenting with what
is available and deciding what will work best in your class with
your particular students and your content area. For further information,
check out the following resources:
Bender, T. (2003). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance
student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Conrad, R.M and Donaldson, J.A. (2004). Engaging the online
learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fink: L.D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences:
An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hanna, DE, Glowacki-Dudka, M. and Conceicai-Runlee, S. (2000).
147 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of
web-based education. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing
Salmon, G. (2003). E-tivities: The key to active online learning.
London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning,
and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. Snyder, W.M. (20020: Cultivating communities
of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Assessment Online
The following resources were used in the development of this web
page:
Nitko, A.J. (1996). Educational assessment of students.
2nd ed. Englewood, NJ: Merrill.
Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning.
Educational Technology, September, 28-33.
Assessment of individuals can be used to provide feedback to students
about their learning, to diagnose problem areas, to provide feedback
to the instructor, to define for students what is most important,
to motivate students, and to grade students as to their quality
of their assignments. They can also be used by institutions to make
various decisions about a student such as selection for inclusion
in a program or school, placement in various levels of instruction,
classification (similar to selection but the categories are independent
rather than ranked in a single category) or the awarding of a credential
in a particular area.
To select and use assessment results meaningfully you need to be
clear about the learning targets you want to assess and be sure
that the assessment techniques you select match the learning targets.
The specific tasks or procedures you use in an assessment should
always permit the student to display the skill or knowledge stated
in the learning target. The also need to be valid
and reliable.
Nitko (p. 103) suggests three criteria for selecting an assessment
procedure:
- the learning targets to be achieved
- the purpose of the assessment (see definitions below for formative
or summative evaluations)
- the advantages of a particular technique to support numbers
1 & 2
He also suggests (p. 124) three fundamental principles for crafting
assessment:
- focus only on important learning targets
- elicit from students only the knowledge and performance that
are relevant to the learning target
- neither prevent nor inhibit a student's ability to demonstrate
attainment of the learning target
Each assessment type has its own advantages and disadvantages.
This chart
supplies an overview of assessment types.
Important terminology:
- assessment: a process for obtaining information that is used
for making decisions about students, curricula and programs and
educational policy
- test: more narrow than assessment; an instrument or systematic
procedure for observing and describing one or more characteristics
of a student using either a numerical scale or a classification
scheme
- measurement: a procedure for assigning numbers (usually called
scores) to a specified attribute or characteristic of a person
in such a way that the numbers describe the degree to which the
person possesses the attribute
- evaluation: the process of making a value judgment about the
worth of a student's product or performance; may or may not be
based on measurements or test results
- formative evaluation: judgment about quality or worth made
during the process of designing or developing instructional materials,
instructional procedures, curricula or educational programs; the
purpose is to modify or improve the product before it is widely
used
- summative evaluation: judgment about the quality or worth of
already completed instructional materials, instructional procedures,
curricula or educational programs; goal is to summarize strengths
or weaknesses and describe the extent to which a properly implemented
program or procedure has attained its stated goals and objectives
- norm-referenced interpretations: describes assessed performance
in terms of a person's position in a reference group
- criterion-referenced interpretations: assessed performance
in terms of the kinds of tasks a person with a given score can
do
- objectivity: the degree to which every observer of a student's
performance will give exactly the same report or result (Cronbach,
1990)
- standardization: the degree to which the observational procedures,
administrative procedures, equipment and materials, and scoring
rules have been fixed so that, insofar as possible, the same procedure
can occur at different times and places (Cronbach, 1990)
- power assessments: the main focus is to assess the amount of
knowledge, comprehension or understanding a student possesses
so no time limit is placed or the time limit is very generous
- rubric: a coherent set of rules used to assess the quality
of a student's performance; guides the raters judgments and ensures
scoring is more objective
Nitko's emphasis on objective reality contrasts with the subjective
reality which is the basis for constructivist learning. Constructivists
believe that learners can only interpret information in the context
of their own experiences and that what they interpret will, to a
certain extent, be individualistic so evaluation guidelines such
as those established by Nitko are less useful.
Jonassen (1991) suggests the following criteria for evaluating
constructivist learning:
- goal-free evaluations: an evaluation is more effective if the
evaluator is not informed in advance what the goals of the instruction
are; rather than relating evaluation in terms of goals Scriven
(1973) recommends using needs assessment methods to determine
what the goals of education should be since verified needs provide
the most objective standards
based on authentic tasks
- need to focus on learning outcomes and evaluations that reflect
the intellectual process of knowledge construction; do this by
focusing on the higher levels of learning outcomes
- evaluate the process of knowledge acquisition, not the product
evaluation should be context dependent and should reflect the
complexities of the learning
- multiple perspectives: if it is appropriate to present multiple
perspectives in learning environments with the expectation that
learners will meaningfully accommodate these different perspectives,
then it is equally important to reflect and accept those multiple
perspectives in the evaluation process; may be accomplished through
a panel of reviewers
- use portfolios rather than a single product, particularly those
that reflect different stages of the learning process
- allow the learners to negotiate the goals of learning and evaluation
"Evaluation from a constructivist perspective should be less
of a reinforcement and/or behavior control tool and more of a self-analysis
and meta-cognitive tool" p. 32
Assessment in Blackboard
Blackboard provides several ways to assess student progress during
a course.
Surveys record answers anonymously. This option is used for informal
assessments of an entire class, opinion polls, or course evaluations.
Survey results are non-graded and anonymous so they aren't suitable
for summative evaluation.
Quizzes and tests are available for assessing individual student
knowledge. They can be set up for automatic grading, immediate feedback
of answers, and/or submission for grading by the instructor.
Types of questions supported by Blackboard:
- Multiple Choice
- True False
- Fill in the Blank
- Multiple Answer
- Ordering
- Matching
- Short Answer/Essay
Creating a survey or test is very easy. As the instructor for your
course:
- Click on the Control Panel button
- Click on Assessment Manager
- Click on Add Survey
- Name the survey
- Type in a brief description of the survey
- Click on the Submit button
- Type in the instructions for completing the survey
- Click on the Submit button
- Select the type of question and you're off!
You can type in all of your questions and reorder them after they
are all in. You can also go back and edit the questions. If you
are creating a test, you'll have the opportunity to provide the
correct answer to a question. Surveys do not have correct answers
associated with them.
Assessment Pools
Also called a question pool, this feature allows instructors to
give exams and quizzes from a bank of questions. So questions are
posted to students randomly. To use this feature you'll need to
develop a bank of questions to pull from. Instead of clicking on
Add Survey as described above you'll click on Pool Manager and then
follow the instructions.
Developed by Susan
M. Colaric for Martin Community College. May 2004. All rights
reserved.
|